Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Michigan Supreme Court, 2006

Vicks v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation

Vicks v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided March 27, 2006 · Corrigan
711 N.W.2d 370; 474 Mich. 1096; 2006 Mich. LEXIS 531 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Vicks v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation

Opinion

711 N.W.2d 370 (2006)
474 Mich. 1096

Marshalene VICKS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 130291, COA No. 263789.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 27, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 30, 2005 *371 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CORRIGAN, J., would deny leave to appeal but continues to adhere to her concurring statement in Donoho v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 474 Mich. 1057, 708 N.W.2d 444 (2006).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑