Michigan Supreme Court, 2006

Nathan v. Crenshaw

Michigan Supreme Court · Decided January 30, 2006

710 N.W.2d 260; 474 Mich. 1024 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

710 N.W.2d 260 (2006)474 Mich. 1024

David E. NATHAN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Larry CRENSHAW, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and
Reginald Smith, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.

Docket No. 129317. COA No. 260219.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

Nathan v. Crenshaw

Opinion

David E. NATHAN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,v.Larry CRENSHAW, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, andReginald Smith, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.

David E. NATHAN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Larry CRENSHAW, Defendant/Cross-Defendant, and
Reginald Smith, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff, Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.