Bank One v. Condit
Bank One v. Condit
708 N.W.2d 401; 474 Mich. 1024
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Bank One v. Condit
Opinion
BANK ONE, NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Timothy B. CONDIT, Defendant-Appellant, and
Craig A. Kolmer and William K. Newcomb, Jr., Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 16, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for immediate consideration and peremptory reversal are DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.