Bank One v. Condit

Michigan Supreme Court January 30, 2006

Bank One v. Condit, 708 N.W.2d 401 (Mich. 2006)

474 Mich. 1024

Opinion

708 N.W.2d 401 (2006)474 Mich. 1024

BANK ONE, NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Timothy B. CONDIT, Defendant-Appellant, and
Craig A. Kolmer and William K. Newcomb, Jr., Defendants.

Docket Nos. 129123 & (49)(50), COA No. 257626.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 16, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for immediate consideration and peremptory reversal are DENIED.

Reference

Status: Published

Bank One v. Condit

Opinion

BANK ONE, NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Timothy B. CONDIT, Defendant-Appellant, andCraig A. Kolmer and William K. Newcomb, Jr., Defendants.

Reference

BANK ONE, NA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Timothy B. CONDIT, Defendant-Appellant, and
Craig A. Kolmer and William K. Newcomb, Jr., Defendants.