HONIGMAN, MILLER, SCHWARTZ & COHN, LLP v. Cogan
HONIGMAN, MILLER, SCHWARTZ & COHN, LLP v. Cogan
740 N.W.2d 655; 480 Mich. 935
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Estate of Stoyka v. Mt. Clemens Gen. Hosp. (Mich. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
HONIGMAN, MILLER, SCHWARTZ & COHN, L.L.P., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
v.
Teisha Tann COGAN, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Joseph Aviv, Miriam Wolock, and Thomas Frazee, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees, and
UHY Advisors MI, Inc., Third-Party Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Morganroth and Morganroth, P.L.L.C., Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.