Et MacKenzie Company v. Long Investment Company, Ltd.
Et MacKenzie Company v. Long Investment Company, Ltd.
740 N.W.2d 258; 2007 WL 3146558
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Et MacKenzie Company v. Long Investment Company, Ltd.
Opinion
E.T. MACKENZIE COMPANY and Keystone Design Group, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
LONG INVESTMENT COMPANY, LTD., Long Investment Company, L.L.C., Long Investment, Inc., NBD Bank Corporation, Equity Funding, Inc., Soil & Materials Engineers, Inc., GE Appliances Division, General Electric Company, Mid-America Tile, Inc., Lansing Clarion Limited Partnership, Michael D. Dudley, Robert C. Lecy, Gregory E. Mayville, James A. Jarvis, Ann O. Jarvis, Margaret E. Jacobs, Michael Panek, Gordon L. Long, Lillian G. Long, and Anthony A. Paradise Trust & Executive Commons, L.L.C., Defendants, and
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Defendant-Appellant, and
Russell Hinkle, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 26, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.