Van Eman v. Cars Protection Plus, Inc.
Van Eman v. Cars Protection Plus, Inc.
738 N.W.2d 749; 480 Mich. 892; 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2191
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- People v. Hilliard (Mich. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Matthew VAN EMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
C.A.R.S. PROTECTION PLUS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.