Ferrari v. ARAMARK SERVICES MANAGEMENT OF MICH., INC.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Henley v. HERSCHELMAN (Mich. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Franca FERRARI, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ARAMARK SERVICES MANAGEMENT OF MICHIGAN, INC., and Banker's Standard Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the order of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the decision of the Workers' Compensation Appellate Commission (WCAC) affirming the magistrate's award of benefits for a closed period. The Court of Appeals erred in adopting the opinion of the WCAC dissenting commissioner where there was support in the record for the decision of the WCAC. Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 462 Mich. 691, 614 N.W.2d 607 (2000). We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals to consider the plaintiff's application for leave to appeal on the issue of whether the defendants may recoup benefits they voluntarily paid.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.