Rogow v. Comerica Bank
Rogow v. Comerica Bank
737 N.W.2d 718
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Rogow v. Comerica Bank
Opinion
Richard ROGOW and Ricki Rogow, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Appellees,
v.
COMERICA BANK, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Homecomings Financial Network, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, and
Rogo, Inc., d/b/a Big Daddy's Parthenon TTG, Inc., d/b/a Big Daddy's Parthenon TTGP, Inc., Big Daddy's Parthenon, Sailing Ship, Inc., Howard Babcock, Andrew C. Jacob, Linden Nelson, Anthanasios Peristeris, Robert S. Silverstein Trust, Robert S. Silverstein, and Jack B. Wolfe, Third-Party Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.