Schoenfeld v. PAROLE BD.
Schoenfeld v. PAROLE BD.
735 N.W.2d 279; 479 Mich. 862; 2007 Mich. LEXIS 1713
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Schoenfeld v. PAROLE BD.
Opinion
Daniel Henry SCHOENFELD, Petitioner,
v.
PAROLE BOARD, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are *280 not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.