DROBOT v. Way
DROBOT v. Way
733 N.W.2d 18; 478 Mich. 914
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
DROBOT v. Way
Opinion
Olena DROBOT and Robert Drobot, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Richard WAY and Wilma Way, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
MARKMAN, J., would grant leave to appeal to consider whether so-called "black ice" constitutes a hazard that should be assessed in terms of traditional "open and obvious" jurisprudence.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.