Ace American Insurance Company v. Emmet Coating Services, Inc.
Ace American Insurance Company v. Emmet Coating Services, Inc.
731 N.W.2d 746; 478 Mich. 871
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Casey v. ASU GROUP (Mich. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and Allianz Insurance Company, Plaintiffs,
v.
EMMET COATING SERVICES, INC., Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and
NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc., a/k/a Hyster Group, and Amerigas Propane, Inc., Defendants/Cross-Defendants, and
Worthington Industries, Inc., d/b/a Worthington Cylinders Corporation, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendant, and
Selective Insurance Company, Ellison, Neilson, Zehe & Antas, P.C., Great Lakes Power Products, Inc., Cardelli, Hebert, Lanfear & Buikema, Michigan Industrial Forklifts, Inc., and Forklift Tire of Michigan, Third-Party Defendants, and
Herndon & Associates, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we *747 are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.