Collier v. Pruzinsky
Collier v. Pruzinsky
730 N.W.2d 243; 477 Mich. 1121
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Collier v. Pruzinsky
Opinion
Susan COLLIER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Silvio Giannetti; and Giannetti Investment Co., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Jerry PRUZINSKY, Defendant-Appellee,
Anna Marie Pruzinsky, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The motion for reconsideration of this Court's March 26, 2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneouly. "No appeal" provisions in contracts have long been recognized by this Court as valid and binding. Wyrzykowski v. Budds, 325 Mich. 199, 201-202, 38 N.W.2d 313 (1949); Cole v. Thayer, 25 Mich. 212 (1872).
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would deny reconsideration without the further statement found in the majority's order.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.