Harry v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Fields v. Ashford (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2022)
- Motley v. GENESYS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER (Mich. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Annette D. HARRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 13, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that portion of the Court of Appeals decision that concluded that plaintiff had abandoned her non-foot injury claims. In her brief on appeal to the Court of Appeals, plaintiff discussed the non-foot injuries and their continuing effect on her life. As a result, plaintiff did not abandon these claims. We REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for a bifurcated retrial with respect to plaintiff's uninsured motorist and personal insurance protection benefit claims, the relief defendant requested in its appeal to the Court of Appeals. The testimony of Dr. Richard Pike *866 will not be considered on retrial of either claim.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.