Detroit School District v. Urs Corporation
Detroit School District v. Urs Corporation
727 N.W.2d 622; 477 Mich. 1031
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Metro v. AMWAY ASIA PACIFIC LTD. (Mich. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
DETROIT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff,
v.
URS CORPORATION, Design Collective and TDC/URS, a/k/a TDC/URS Corporation, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
Mark English, Emmett B. Hagood, Jr., Carole Harris, Gary Baldwin, Harish Chopia, Cindy Garcia, Thomas Hampson, William Stevenson and Beverly Hannah Jones, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs,
v.
Bailey Turner Venture, El Bailey Company, Inc., and Turner Construction, Third-Party Defendants/Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are *623 not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.