BIORESOURCE, INC. v. City of Detroit
BIORESOURCE, INC. v. City of Detroit
726 N.W.2d 37; 477 Mich. 1004
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- People v. DOGGENDORF (Mich. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
BIORESOURCE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Oppmac, Inc., Intervening Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF DETROIT, Joseph Vassallo, Paul Bernard, and Frederick Rottach, Defendants-Appellees, and
Central Maintenance Services, Inc., Sam Fodale, Jerry Fodale, State of Michigan, and Diamond Dismantling, Inc., Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.