Michigan Supreme Court, 2007

LANZO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Wayne Steel Erectors

LANZO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Wayne Steel Erectors
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided January 5, 2007 · Marilyn J. Kelly
725 N.W.2d 454; 477 Mich. 983; 2007 Mich. LEXIS 48 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

LANZO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Wayne Steel Erectors

Opinion

725 N.W.2d 454 (2007)

LANZO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WAYNE STEEL ERECTORS, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 130992. COA No. 264165.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 5, 2007.

On December 14, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the January 26, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered. MCR 7.302(G)(1). In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that portion of the Court of Appeals judgment that affirmed the circuit court's grant of summary disposition to the defendant. Fernando Agueros, the plaintiff in the underlying injury action on which the plaintiff sought indemnity, had a duty to proceed with reasonable caution for his own safety, Lugo v. Ameritech Corp, Inc, 464 Mich. 512, 522, 629 N.W.2d 384 (2001). Agueros admitted at his deposition that he misjudged the distance to the column when he swung the rebar around that he was carrying and the leading ends of the rebar *455 struck the column, causing his fall. Therefore, Agueros's negligence was at least partially responsible for his accident, so the plaintiff could not have been solely responsible for Agueros's accident, and MCL 691.991 is inapplicable. We REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for entry of an order granting the plaintiff's motion for summary disposition against the defendant.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.