Michigan Supreme Court, 2008

GUARDIAN ALARM COMPANY OF MICHIGAN v. May

Michigan Supreme Court · Decided April 28, 2008

747 N.W.2d 283; 480 Mich. 1188 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

747 N.W.2d 283 (2008)

GUARDIAN ALARM COMPANY OF MICHIGAN d/b/a Guardian Security Services, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Richard T. MAY, Bernard Schoch, David J. Marcus and Micronetics Design Corporation, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellees, and
Michael Marks, John Smith, and Don Faybrick, Defendants.

Docket No. 135635. COA No. 269901.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 28, 2008.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

GUARDIAN ALARM COMPANY OF MICHIGAN v. May

Opinion

GUARDIAN ALARM COMPANY OF MICHIGAN d/b/a Guardian Security Services, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,v.Richard T. MAY, Bernard Schoch, David J. Marcus and Micronetics Design Corporation, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellees, andMichael Marks, John Smith, and Don Faybrick, Defendants.

GUARDIAN ALARM COMPANY OF MICHIGAN d/b/a Guardian Security Services, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Richard T. MAY, Bernard Schoch, David J. Marcus and Micronetics Design Corporation, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellees, and
Michael Marks, John Smith, and Don Faybrick, Defendants.