Mayor of Detroit v. Governor of Michigan
Mayor of Detroit v. Governor of Michigan
755 N.W.2d 153; 482 Mich. 960; 2008 Mich. LEXIS 1880
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of State (Mich. 2018)
- Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of State (Mich. Ct. App. 2018)
- Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of State (Mich. Ct. App. 2018)
- Christopher Lee Duncan v. State of Michigan (Mich. 2010)
- Henry v. Dow Chemical Co. (Mich. 2009)
- City of Farmington v. Farmington Survey Committee (Mich. Ct. App. 2024)
- Tom J Barrow v. Wayne County Board of Canvassers (Mich. Ct. App. 2022)
- Victoria Burton-Harris v. Wayne County Clerk (Mich. Ct. App. 2021)
- Barrow v. City of Detroit Election Commission (Mich. Ct. App. 2013)
- System Soft Technologies, LLC v. Artemis Technologies, Inc. (Mich. Ct. App. 2013)
- Houston v. Governor (Mich. Ct. App. 2012)
- Stand up for Democracy v. Secretary of State (Mich. Ct. App. 2012)
- Protect MI Constitution v. Secretary of State (Mich. Ct. App. 2012)
- Protect MI Constitution v. Secretary of State (Mich. Ct. App. 2012)
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'n (Mich. 2009)
- Hartford Ins Co of the Midwest v. Mich Catastrophic Claims Assn (Mich. 2009)
- United States Fidelity Ins v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Assn (Mich. 2009)
- In re Executive Message of Governor Requesting Authorization of a Certified Question (Mich. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
MAYOR OF DETROIT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN and Detroit City Council, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the September 2, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay of proceedings is DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.