Schindler v. ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT COMPANY
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Darryl SCHINDLER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT COMPANY and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Defendants-Appellants, and
Reliance National Indemnity Company and Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Association, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 31, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration, as on leave granted, of the issue whether the Michigan Bureau of Worker's Compensation has jurisdiction over the controversy arising out of plaintiff's injury, MCL 418.845. The Court of Appeals shall address the remaining issues only if it determines that jurisdiction in Michigan is proper.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would deny leave to appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.