People v. Hummel
People v. Hummel
750 N.W.2d 174; 481 Mich. 909
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
People v. Hummel
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Richard Alan HUMMEL, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 9, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting statement in People v. Houlihan, 480 Mich. 1165, 746 N.W.2d 879 (2008).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.