Petersen v. RIVERVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT
Petersen v. RIVERVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT
747 N.W.2d 302; 480 Mich. 1187
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Petersen v. RIVERVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT
Opinion
George V. PETERSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RIVERVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Jeffery Klaft, David Rudicil, and Michael P. McCarthy, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 26, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for peremptory reversal, to remand, and to strike are DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.