McCoy v. LAMOTTE COACHLIGHT CORPORATION
McCoy v. LAMOTTE COACHLIGHT CORPORATION
747 N.W.2d 296; 480 Mich. 1191
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
McCoy v. LAMOTTE COACHLIGHT CORPORATION
Opinion
Timothy M. McCOY and Robin LaBarge McCoy, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
LAMOTTE COACHLIGHT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, and
Schult Homes Corporation, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.