Hamilton v. Attorney Grievance
Hamilton v. Attorney Grievance
774 N.W.2d 864; 485 Mich. 980
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Hamilton v. Attorney Grievance
Opinion
Frederick HAMILTON, Plaintiff,
v.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE Commission, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.