People v. Armstrong
People v. Armstrong
772 N.W.2d 363; 485 Mich. 888
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
People v. Armstrong
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Akili Eugene ARMSTRONG, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we *364 are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in People v. Idziak, 484 Mich. 549, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2009).
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider People v. Idziak, 484 Mich. 549, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2009).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.