People v. CHASTON
People v. CHASTON
772 N.W.2d 357; 485 Mich. 893
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
People v. CHASTON
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roger CHASTON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in People v. Idziak, 484 Mich. 549, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2009).
*358 MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider People v. Idziak, 484 Mich. 549, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2009).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.