Cole v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
Cole v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
767 N.W.2d 654; 483 Mich. 654; 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1556
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Merhonda COLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, d/b/a Smart, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 20, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., and HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.