Michigan Supreme Court, 2009

Lee v. City of Detroit

Lee v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided June 23, 2009
766 N.W.2d 817; 483 Mich. 1091 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Lee v. City of Detroit

Opinion

Order Granting Oral Argument in Case Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal June 23, 2009:

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory-action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether, with respect to the plaintiffs claim that the police department violated the Whistle-blowers’ Protection Act, MCL 15.361 et seq., the Court of Appeals erred in ruling that the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish a genuine issue of material fact regarding a causal connection between his November 2, 2004, internal complaint and his transfer from the Gang Enforcement Section to the Records and Identification Section of the police department. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers. Court of Appeals No. 274530.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.