Michigan Supreme Court, 2009

CUNMULAJ v. Chaney

Michigan Supreme Court · Decided May 27, 2009

765 N.W.2d 328 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

765 N.W.2d 328 (2009)

Sherif CUNMULAJ and Dawn Cunmulaj, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Kristen CHANEY and Harold Schott, Defendants-Appellees.
Sherif Cunmulaj and Dawn Cunmulaj, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Michigan State University, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket Nos. 138390, 138391. COA Nos. 282264, 282265.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 27, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 12, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

CUNMULAJ v. Chaney

Opinion

Sherif CUNMULAJ and Dawn Cunmulaj, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Kristen CHANEY and Harold Schott, Defendants-Appellees.Sherif Cunmulaj and Dawn Cunmulaj, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Michigan State University, Defendant-Appellee.

Order

Sherif CUNMULAJ and Dawn Cunmulaj, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Kristen CHANEY and Harold Schott, Defendants-Appellees.
Sherif Cunmulaj and Dawn Cunmulaj, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Michigan State University, Defendant-Appellee.