Michigan Supreme Court, 2009

Pellegrino v. AMPCO SYSTEMS PARKING

Pellegrino v. AMPCO SYSTEMS PARKING
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided May 7, 2009
764 N.W.2d 569; 483 Mich. 999 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Pellegrino v. AMPCO SYSTEMS PARKING

Opinion

The motion for immediate consideration of the motion to strike is granted. The motion to strike is granted in part. The paragraph spanning pages 1 and 2 of the plaintiffs’ response to the defendant’s application for leave to appeal is stricken because it contains information that is not part of the record on appeal. MCR 7.210(A)(1). The motion for extension of time to file a reply and the motion to note recent Supreme Court decision are granted. The application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2008, judgment of the Court of Appeals is granted, limited to the issue whether the defendant is entitled to a new trial based on a violation of MCR 2.511(F)(2). Court of Appeals No. 274743.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.