Michigan Supreme Court, 2009

People v. Hoch

People v. Hoch
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided May 1, 2009 · Young, Corrigan
764 N.W.2d 282; 483 Mich. 984 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

People v. Hoch

Concurring Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

(concurring). I would direct the parties to include in their discussion the applicability and effect of MCR 7.210(B)(2), which describes the appellant’s duty to file a settled statement of facts when a transcript of proceedings in the trial court is unavailable. The record before this Court appears to have been filed without heed to this rule.

Young, J. I join the statement of Justice Corrigan.

Opinion of the Court

Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal May 1, 2009:

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers. Court of Appeals No. 269739.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.