Summary Disposition April 29, 2009:

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in beu of granting leave to appeal, we affirm the Court of Appeals conclusion, under the provisions of the master deed and the restrictive covenants in this case, that neither the bylaws nor the restrictive covenants were binding on the defendants, because they were unrecorded. We vacate the Court of Appeals majority’s analysis of the Michigan Condominium Act, MCL 559.101 et seq., because it is unnecessary to the decision in this case. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. Court of Appeals No. 278514.