Leave to Appeal Granted April 29, 2009:

The parties shall include among the issues to he briefed: (1) whether the “no very serious consequences” rule of Silva v Ada Twp, 416 Mich 153 (1982), was superseded by the enactment of 1978 PA 637, MCL 125.297a (now recodified in nearly identical language as MCL 125. 3207); (2) whether the “no very serious consequences” rule violates the separation of powers doctrine by providing enhanced judicial review of local zoning decisions; and (3) whether the “no very serious consequences” rule impermissibly shifts the burden of proof onto the local government to defend its zoning policy.

The motions for leave to file briefs amicus curiae are granted. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented *983 in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.