Summary Disposition April 8, 2009:

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration, as on leave granted, of the issues: (1) whether the redacted transcript of the prior testimony of Matthew O’Non at his own trial, which was admitted in this case, was “testimonial” under Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36 (2004); (2) whether any statements in that transcript were hearsay under MRE 801(c) because they were offered to prove the truth of the matters asserted and therefore were barred by Crawford-, and (3) whether all statements in that transcript that were offered to prove the falsity of the matters asserted necessarily were not hearsay under MRE 801(c) and thus were not barred by Crawford. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. We do not retain jurisdiction. Court of Appeals No. 280262.