Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Michigan Supreme Court, 2009

Romero v. BURT MOEKE HARDWOODS, INC.

Romero v. BURT MOEKE HARDWOODS, INC.
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided March 6, 2009 · Weaver
761 N.W.2d 94 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Romero v. BURT MOEKE HARDWOODS, INC.

Opinion

761 N.W.2d 94 (2009)

Pablo Gutierrez ROMERO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
BURT MOEKE HARDWOODS, INC., and Accident Fund Insurance Company of America, Defendants-Appellants.

Docket No. 137262. COA No. 271122.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 6, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 29, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

WEAVER, J. (concurring).

I concur in the order denying leave to appeal. As stated in my concurring statement in Cain v. Waste Mgt, Inc. (After Remand), 472 Mich. 236, 262, 697 N.W.2d 130 (2005), the word "loss" "includes not only amputation but also those situations in which there is a loss of the usefulness of the limb or member."

MARILYN J. KELLY, C.J., joins the statement of WEAVER, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑