Michigan Supreme Court, 2009

Golden v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Michigan Supreme Court · Decided January 27, 2009

759 N.W.2d 393 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

759 N.W.2d 393 (2009)

Laurie Karbal GOLDEN, f/k/a Laurie Karbal Brant, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee,
v.
AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, and
Norman H. Brant, d/b/a Norman H. Brant, DPM, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant/Appellant, and
Franklin Bank, N.A., Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff.

Docket No. 137513. COA No. 284515.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 27, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 5, 2008 *394 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

Golden v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Opinion

Laurie Karbal GOLDEN, f/k/a Laurie Karbal Brant, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee,v.AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, andNorman H. Brant, d/b/a Norman H. Brant, DPM, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant/Appellant, andFranklin Bank, N.A., Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff.

Order

Laurie Karbal GOLDEN, f/k/a Laurie Karbal Brant, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee,
v.
AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, and
Norman H. Brant, d/b/a Norman H. Brant, DPM, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant/Appellant, and
Franklin Bank, N.A., Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff.