Schellenberg v. BINGHAM TOWNSHIP
Schellenberg v. BINGHAM TOWNSHIP
788 N.W.2d 441; 488 Mich. 871
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Schellenberg v. BINGHAM TOWNSHIP
Opinion
Shelly SCHELLENBERG and David Riggle, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
BINGHAM TOWNSHIP, Respondent-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 11, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, *442 and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
DAVIS, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.