People v. EL-AMIN
People v. EL-AMIN
783 N.W.2d 330; 486 Mich. 1041
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
21 later published cases cite this decision.
- 20241226_C366696_48_366696P.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2024)
- People of Michigan v. Rodney Carter (Mich. 2010)
- People of Michigan v. Jerome Randy Rogers (Mich. Ct. App. 2026)
- 20250113_C367821_102_367821.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2025)
- People of Michigan v. David Gerard Wandolowski (Mich. Ct. App. 2024)
- People of Michigan v. Frederick William Cords Jr (Mich. Ct. App. 2023)
- 20231130_C365110_28_365110.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2023)
- People of Michigan v. Carmia Givens (Mich. Ct. App. 2022)
- People of Michigan v. Aaron James Miller (Mich. Ct. App. 2019)
- Epicurean Developments LLC v. Summit Township (Mich. Ct. App. 2017)
- Epicurean Developments LLC v. Summit Township (Mich. Ct. App. 2017)
- Kevin Logan v. Charter Township of West Bloomfield (Mich. Ct. App. 2017)
- Kevin Logan v. Charter Township of West Bloomfield (Mich. Ct. App. 2017)
- Afscme Council 25 Local 3317 v. Charter County of Wayne (Mich. Ct. App. 2017)
- Afscme Council 25 Local 3317 v. Charter County of Wayne (Mich. Ct. App. 2017)
- Michael Wenners v. Matthew D Chisolm (Mich. Ct. App. 2015)
- Estate of Skyler Seils v. Fraternal Order of Police Associates (Mich. Ct. App. 2015)
- People of Michigan v. Jahleel Amon Hoskins (Mich. Ct. App. 2015)
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. Seils (Mich. Ct. App. 2015)
- Manoushag Al-Raeis v. Aurora Bank Fsb (Mich. Ct. App. 2014)
- Anglers of the Ausable Inc v. Dept of Environmental Quality (Mich. 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
PEOPLE of The State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Laticia EL-AMIN, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 9, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.