Grievance Administrator v. Baker
Grievance Administrator v. Baker
783 N.W.2d 119; 486 Mich. 1040; 2010 Mich. LEXIS 1164
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Grievance Administrator v. Baker
Opinion
GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Dianne L. BAKER, Respondent-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CORRIGAN and YOUNG, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
WEAVER, J., not participating. I abstain from voting on any items dealing with the Judicial Tenure Commission (JTC) and/or the Attorney Grievance Commission (AGC) to avoid any appearance that I could be trying to affect the outcome of the referrals of me to the JTC and AGC by Justices Corrigan, Young and Markman.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.