Braverman v. Sentry Insurance
Braverman v. Sentry Insurance
777 N.W.2d 167; 485 Mich. 1079
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- People v. Cross (Mich. 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Eric A. BRAVERMAN, Guardian and Conservator of Pamella Jean Smutzki, a Legally Incapacitated Individual, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SENTRY INSURANCE, a Mutual Insurance Company, Dairyland Insurance Company, a subsidiary of Sentry Insurance, and Gary K. Smith Insurance, a sole proprietorship, Defendants-Appellees, and
Auto Owners Insurance Company, Proposed Intervening Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 7, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.