Patrick McCarthy v. Alison Scofield
Patrick McCarthy v. Alison Scofield
Opinion
STATE OF MICHIGAN
SUPREME COURT
143785(30)
PATRICK MCCARTHY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v SC: 143785 COA: 300921 ALISON SCOFIELD, ET AL, Ct Claims: 06-179-MZ Defendants-Appellees Oakland CC: 06-079432-NO _________________________
STATEMENTS OF THE JUSTICES DENYING THE MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION
October 18, 2011
YOUNG, C.J. Plaintiff has filed yet another motion in his efforts to disqualify me. There are no new grounds asserted in his latest motion that have not already been asserted. I deny plaintiff’s motion for disqualification for the reasons stated in my September 16, 2011 statement in McCarthy v Sosnick, Docket Nos. 142461-2.
CAVANAGH, J. Plaintiff has moved for my disqualification. I deny plaintiff’s motion for disqualification for the reasons stated in my September 16, 2011 statement in McCarthy v Sosnick, Docket Nos. 142461-62.
MARILYN KELLY, J. Plaintiff has moved for my disqualification. I deny plaintiff’s motion for disqualification for the reasons stated in my September 16, 2011 statement in McCarthy v Sosnick, Docket Nos. 142461-62.
MARKMAN, J. This is to deny plaintiff’s motion for my disqualification for the reasons set forth in my statement of September 16, 2011 in McCarthy v Sosnick, Docket Nos. 142461-2. HATHAWAY, J. Plaintiff has moved for my disqualification. I deny plaintiff’s motion for disqualification for the reasons stated in my September 16, 2011 statement in McCarthy v Sosnick, Docket Nos. 142461-2.
2
Reference
- Status
- Published