in Re budd/budd-donahue/donahue Minors
in Re budd/budd-donahue/donahue Minors
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 15, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 143894 Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly In re BUDD, BUDD-DONAHUE, SC: 143894 Brian K. Zahra, DONAHUE, Minors. COA: 301995 Justices Wayne CC Family Division: 08-483774 ____________________________________/ By order of November 10, 2011, the application for leave to appeal the September 29, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in In re Morris, Minor (Docket No. 142759). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on May 4, 2012, 491 Mich ___ (2012), the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that part of the judgment of the Court of Appeals applying the conditional-affirmance remedy, CONDITIONALLY REVERSE the Wayne Circuit Court, Family Division’s termination of the respondent’s parental rights, and REMAND this case to the circuit court for resolution of the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 USC 1901 et seq. On remand, the circuit court shall first ensure that notice is properly made to the appropriate entities. If the circuit court conclusively determines that ICWA does not apply to the child protective proceeding—because the children are not Indian children or because the properly noticed tribe does not timely respond—the circuit court’s order terminating the respondent’s parental rights shall be reinstated. If, however, the circuit court concludes that ICWA does apply to the child protective proceeding, the circuit court’s order terminating the respondent’s parental rights must be vacated and all proceedings must begin anew in accord with the procedural and substantive requirements of ICWA.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
June 15, 2012 _________________________________________ s0612 Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.