State of Michigan Ex Rel Marcia Gurganus v. Cvs Caremark Corp
State of Michigan Ex Rel Marcia Gurganus v. Cvs Caremark Corp
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan August 5, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Rehearing No. 599 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly 146791(136) Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, Justices STATE OF MICHIGAN ex rel. MARCIA GURGANUS, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 146791 v COA: 299997 Kent CC: 09-003411-CZ CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, CVS PHARMACY, INC., CAREMARK, L.L.C., CAREMARK MICHIGAN SPECIALTY PHARMACY, L.L.C., CAREMARK MICHIGAN SPECIALTY PHARMACY HOLDING, L.L.C., CVS MICHIGAN, L.L.C., WOODWARD DETROIT CVS, L.L.C., REVCO DISCOUNT DRUG CENTERS, INC., KMART HOLDING CORPORATION, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, SEARS HOLDINGS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, RITE AID OF MICHIGAN, INC., PERRY DRUG STORES, INC., TARGET CORPORATION, KROGER COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, KROGER COMPANY, WALGREEN COMPANY, and WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendants-Appellants. _________________________________________/ CITY OF LANSING and DICKINSON PRESS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, SC: 146792 v COA: 299998 Kent CC: 09-007827-CZ RITE AID OF MICHIGAN, INC., and PERRY DRUG STORES, INC., Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees. _________________________________________/ CITY OF LANSING, DICKINSON PRESS, INC., and SCOTT MURPHY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, SC: 146793 v COA: 299999 Kent CC: 10-000619-CZ CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, CVS PHARMACY, INC., CAREMARK, L.L.C., CAREMARK MICHIGAN SPECIALTY PHARMACY, L.L.C., CAREMARK MICHIGAN SPECIALTY PHARMACY HOLDING, L.L.C., CVS MICHIGAN, L.L.C., WOODWARD DETROIT CVS, L.L.C., REVCO DISCOUNT DRUG CENTERS, INC., KMART HOLDING CORPORATION, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, SEARS HOLDINGS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, TARGET CORPORATION, KROGER COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, KROGER COMPANY, WALGREEN COMPANY, and WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the motion for rehearing is considered, and it is DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
August 5, 2014 Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.