Michigan Supreme Court, 2015

John Does 1-7 v. Department of Corrections

John Does 1-7 v. Department of Corrections
Michigan Supreme Court · Decided April 3, 2015
John Does 1-7 v. Department of Corrections

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan April 3, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly 151034(33) Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3, Richard H. Bernstein, Justices JOHN DOE 4, JOHN DOE 5, JOHN DOE 6, and JOHN DOE 7, on behalf of themselves and a class of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, v SC: 151034

COA: 324602 Washtenaw CC: 13-001196-CZ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

DIRECTOR OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR

OF MDOC CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES

ADMINISTRATION, FORMER DEPUTY

DIRECTOR OF MDOC CORRECTIONAL

FACILITIES ADMINISTRATION, CHIEF

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF MDOC

CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES

ADMINISTRATION, WARDEN OF CARSON

CITY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN

OF CHARLES EGELER RECEPTION AND

GUIDANCE CENTER, WARDEN OF

EARNEST C. BROOKS CORRECTIONAL

FACILITY, WARDEN OF GUS HARRISON

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN OF

RICHARD A. HANDLON CORRECTIONAL

FACILITY, WARDEN OF OAKS

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN OF

THUMB CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,

WARDEN OF CHIPPEWA CORRECTIONAL

FACILITY, WARDEN OF MARQUETTE

BRANCH PRISON, and WARDEN OF

BELLAMY CREEK CORRECTIONAL

FACILITY,

Defendants-Appellants. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 6, 2015 order is considered, and it is GRANTED in part. On reconsideration, we VACATE that part of the March 6, 2015 order stating that “[t]rial court proceedings are stayed pending the completion of this appeal.” We MODIFY the order to grant the motion for stay only with regard to the Washtenaw Circuit Court’s class certification orders, dated October 29, 2014, and November 21, 2014. As before, on motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Appeals may modify, set aside, or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear. In all other respects, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 3, 2015 d0331

Clerk

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.