Adam Heichel v. Geico Indemnity Company

Michigan Supreme Court

Adam Heichel v. Geico Indemnity Company

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

December 28, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

153501-2 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano ADAM HEICHEL, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff, Joan L. Larsen, Justices and ST. JOHN MACOMB-OAKLAND HOSPITAL, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee, and MENDELSON ORTHOPEDICS, P.C., Intervening Plaintiff, v SC: 153501-2 COA: 323818; 324045 Wayne CC: 12-003780-NF GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, and EAN HOLDINGS, INC. and ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC., Defendants/Third-Party Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 28, 2016 d1212 Clerk

Reference

Status
Published