Stacy Oakes v. Court of Appeals
Stacy Oakes v. Court of Appeals
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 19, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 161393 & (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(12)(13) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein STACY OAKES, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiff, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 161393 COURT OF APPEALS, Defendant.
_________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED.
The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The motions to stay the Court of Appeals proceedings, to correct clerical errors, for relief from order, and for temporary restraining order are DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
June 19, 2020 s0616 Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.