Daniel William Rudd v. Andrea Joy Averill
Daniel William Rudd v. Andrea Joy Averill
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 30, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 160425 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem Stephen J. Markman DANIEL WILLIAM RUDD, Brian K. Zahra Plaintiff-Appellant, Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement v SC: 160425 Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices COA: 340135 Muskegon CC: 07-036874-DM ANDREA JOY AVERILL, f/k/a ANDREA JOY WAGENMAKER, f/k/a ANDREA JOY RUDD, Defendant-Appellee.
_____________________________________/ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 30, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
June 30, 2020 b0622 Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.