Laveta Anderson v. Jenny Shih Do
Laveta Anderson v. Jenny Shih Do
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan December 23, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 161686 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein LAVETA ANDERSON and CHARLES J. TAUNT, Elizabeth T. Clement Plaintiffs-Appellees, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 161686 COA: 344549 Oakland CC: 2016-153143-NH JENNY SHIH, D.O., INOCENCIO CUESTA, M.D., MALINI VENKATRAM, M.D., SUCHITA BHEEMREDDY, M.D., KARTHIK YADAGIRI, PT, RUPA PATEL, PT, UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN GROUP, VHS PHYSICIANS OF MICHIGAN, HARPER-HUTZEL HOSPITAL, LEGACY HHH, VHS HARPER-HUTZEL, INC., VHS OF MICHIGAN, INC., LEGACY DMC, TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL, THERAMATRIX, INC., d/b/a THERAMATRIX PHYSICAL REHABILITATION, THERAMATRIX PHYSICAL REHABILITATION, THERAMATRIX PHYSICAL THERAPY NETWORK, and THERAMATRIX PHYSICAL THERAPY PLAN, INC., Defendants, and THE WELLNESS PLAN, Defendant-Appellant.
____________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
December 23, 2020 a1216 Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.