Laveta Anderson v. Jenny Shih Do
Laveta Anderson v. Jenny Shih Do
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan December 23, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 161649 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra LAVETA ANDERSON and CHARLES J. TAUNT, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiffs-Appellees, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 161649 COA: 344540 Oakland CC: 2016-153143-NH JENNY SHIH, D.O., INOCENCIO CUESTA, M.D., MALINI VENKATRAM, M.D., SUCHITA BHEEMREDDY, M.D., UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN GROUP, VHS PHYSICIANS OF MICHIGAN, HARPER-HUTZEL HOSPITAL, LEGACY HHH, VHS HARPER-HUTZEL, INC., VHS OF MICHIGAN, INC., LEGACY DMC, TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL, and THE WELLNESS PLAN, Defendants, and KARTHIK YADAGIRI, PT, RUPA PATEL, PT, THERAMATRIX, INC., d/b/a THERAMATRIX PHYSICAL REHABILITATION, THERAMATRIX PHYSICAL REHABILITATION, THERAMATRIX PHYSICAL THERAPY NETWORK, and THERAMATRIX PHYSICAL THERAPY PLAN, INC., Defendants-Appellants.
____________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
December 23, 2020 a1216 Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.