Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co.
Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co.
349 N.W.2d 605; 1984 Minn. App. LEXIS 3228
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co.
Opinion of the Court
Continental Insurance Company argues that, since the legislature has repealed the underinsured motorist coverage section of the No-Fault Act, they are free to exclude stacking of benefits. In Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co., 349 N.W.2d 345 (Minn.Ct.App. 1984), this court held that the repeal did not change the nature of underinsured motorist coverage and, therefore, attempted “anti-stacking” exclusions, such as the one in this case, are void.
DECISION
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.