State v. Biederstedt

Minnesota Court of Appeals
State v. Biederstedt, 367 N.W.2d 84 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985)
1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4118
Popovich, Forsberg, Leslie

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 3 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

State v. Biederstedt

Opinion

SUMMARY OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

FACTS

Respondent John Biederstedt pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery, Minn.Stat. *85 § 609.245 (1982), of a convenience store in Willmar, Minnesota. In State v. Ritt, 363 N.W.2d 908 (Minn.Ct.App. 1985), this court upheld the dispositional departure of Bied-erstedt’s accomplice in that same offense.

DECISION

The trial court based its departure on Biederstedt’s amenability to probation. As in Ritt, the record supports our determination that the court did not abuse its discretion in its departure. See State v. Olson, 325 N.W.2d 13 (Minn. 1982); State v. Trog, 323 N.W.2d 28 (Minn. 1982).

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. John David BIEDERSTEDT, Respondent
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published