State v. Biederstedt
Minnesota Court of Appeals
State v. Biederstedt, 367 N.W.2d 84 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985)
1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4118
Popovich, Forsberg, Leslie
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
State v. Biederstedt
Opinion
SUMMARY OPINION
FACTS
Respondent John Biederstedt pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery, Minn.Stat. *85 § 609.245 (1982), of a convenience store in Willmar, Minnesota. In State v. Ritt, 363 N.W.2d 908 (Minn.Ct.App. 1985), this court upheld the dispositional departure of Bied-erstedt’s accomplice in that same offense.
DECISION
The trial court based its departure on Biederstedt’s amenability to probation. As in Ritt, the record supports our determination that the court did not abuse its discretion in its departure. See State v. Olson, 325 N.W.2d 13 (Minn. 1982); State v. Trog, 323 N.W.2d 28 (Minn. 1982).
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. John David BIEDERSTEDT, Respondent
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published